|
Craig Whalley, delegate of
LSRMail
(1)
The 2004 LSR Congress took
place without a noticeable hitch this past
weekend
in
Berkeley, CA. Delegates were
present from three continents, representing
groups in four countries.
There was an opening reception on Friday night,
"breakout" sessions Saturday
morning, a major presentation by William White
(author of
"Slaying the Dragon: the History of Addiction Treatment and
Recovery in
America") Saturday afternoon, a banquet with live
entertainment
Saturday
evening and the official delegates meeting on Sunday
morning.
I want to give the full
flavor of the gathering in the hope that it will
entice others to attend
future Congresses, so bear with what will be a
lengthy report, even by my
long-winded standards (although it will be
nowhere near
the epic length of my report on the 2002 Congress).
The shuttle to Seattle/Tacoma
airport picked me up at my apartment at about
6 a.m. for a noon flight to
Oakland the day before the Congress. The airport
is 100 miles or more from my
home and there is no longer any air service
from
Port Angeles to SeaTac, so a
shuttle seemed the best option, even
though it meant a very long
trip. Aside from too much sitting (and too much
John Grisham), the trip was
uneventful and I arrived at
Oakland's airport
around
2 p.m. and took the BART to
within a block of my hotel. Within
minutes, I had hooked up with
Jane, and then Jack, who were staying at the
same hotel, and soon
thereafter we were joined by Laura, Karen ("Shipmate"),
Rebecca, Marie
and Mike ("Sage"). Many of us, of course, had never met one
another. We
went for a long walk around downtown
Berkeley, which is tucked
up
against the
University of California
campus, and then had an enjoyable
(and cheap) dinner of Indian
food.
At this and every other
informal gathering of LSRians, the talk was
amazingly effortless and non-stop. For me, and I think for
many others, the
sharing that occurs on LSRmail and the chats (and I'm sure
in f2f groups as
well)
eliminates almost all need for the "getting to know you"
stuff.
There's a
common bond stemming from our shared condition, and an
established
intimacy
proceeding from the support group process. This is true even
between people
who may barely remember who's who and who said what on the
list.
Especially for those, like
me, who became isolated during their heavy
drinking years, this easy
intimacy is very powerful. Suddenly I'm surrounded
by people who know -- and
fully understand -- my worst secret, and despite
that, or
because of that, they accept me completely.
On Friday morning several of
us rode the BART train into San Francisco and
acted like
tourists, just like normal people do. We rode the cable
cars,
visited
Chinatown, ate dim sum,
trudged up and down steep hills and walked
along the waterfront. And we
talked and talked and talked.
That evening the first
official event occurred -- a reception where
delegates
and
guests could meet. Before hand, a few of us went to dinner
(Afghan food,
this time),
which was dumb since the food at the reception -- provided
by
Bay area
members, I believe -- was excellent and plentiful. .
Even with more than two years
of sobriety, and two previous Congresses,
under my belt, I found myself
somewhat overwhelmed by being in a room filled
with my comrades. There was
CA from
Japan, Marty and Gillian and
Chet and
Bill from the Bay area, and
LSRmail folks I knew only by name and conveners
from all over that I didn't
know at all. I felt myself being a little stiff,
not from fear
but rather from the need to keep powerful emotions in check.
These people,
to me, are like a large family -- more so than my real
family,
who don't know,
or don't understand, what my addiction has meant for me. LSR
is the place
where, if I have to go there, they have to take me.
There was more talk, of
course, as a small ensemble played delightful music
and the food was enjoyed. The
reception was in a hospital meeting room and
a regular LSR meeting was
held in a smaller room next door. Many of the
people at the
reception sat in on that meeting, and I had planned to, but
I
couldn't tear
myself away from
Marjorie and Syl and Andrea and
the others.
Well, maybe
the food had something to do with it, too.
(2)
All the events of the
Congress (except the Saturday night banquet) took
place at a hospital meeting
room within walking distance of the hotels most
of the out-of-towners were
staying in. Those who weren't in hotels stayed
either with
personal friends or with local LSR members. Things certainly
weren't as cozy
as they were last year in
Florida, where everyone was
in the
same place all the time, but
for me, at least, there was a wonderful sense
of being pretty totally
immersed in the company of those I came to see.
The Saturday morning groups I
attended dealt with starting new LSR meetings,
followed by one on the
problems of running a group. These discussions were
very well attended. The
information and views offered were encouraging and
helpful, but
there wasn't enough time for the sort of detail that I was
hoping for. I
think there was a general consensus that more time should be
allotted to
these subjects next year. The
LSR Service Center offers a
monthly
program for
training new conveners -- I think it would be a fine idea to
integrate that
into the Congress offerings.
It was interesting to see the
large differences in approach to creating and
running meetings that were
offered by those who led the discussion. This is
very typical of LSR, of
course. Clearly, there is no one template for what
works in
starting and maintaining a group. In the Bay area most of
the
groups, I
think, are held in association with treatment centers. That
is,
after all,
where you'll find a lot of potential members. Getting the
treatment
centers there to cooperate with LSR has been a huge
challenge, but
resistance is
steadily fading as LSR's reputation grows. It's a tough
slog,
though,
overcoming the bias towards AA.
[Brief digression: some of us
(well, me) want to start groups independent of
the "addiction
professionals," but then there's the problem of how to reach
potential members, both to
start the group and to sustain it over time.
There's a huge
infrastructure for directing addicts to 12-step groups and
that system is
closed to us until we have "legitimacy," which will come to
us only if we
convince the treatment industry that we're "worthy," which
means going the
route that the Bay area LSRians have taken.]
After a lunch break, we came
together for the keynote address by William
White. His four hour
presentation was totally engrossing, covering the
history of addiction in this
country from before the white man arrived (some
native tribes
did have alcohol and others had hallucinogenic plants --
none
seemed to have
any problems with addiction) to the present day, when are
"modern"
approaches to addiction seem no more successful than the
quackery
of 100 years
ago.
White did end on an
optimistic note, predicting we as a culture are on the
verge of a major shift in
thinking about alcohol, drugs and addiction. If I
understood him correctly (not
a certainty), he thinks the changing attitudes
towards smoking
may be a precursor of a similar change in societal attitudes
towards drugs
and alcohol.
The room was packed for
White's presentation, with 100 or more people
present, including LSRians
along with interested Bay area treatment
professionals of various
sorts.
After the presentation, it
was back to the hotel for a brief (and much
needed) rest and then a
drive, with Itchy at the wheel of a rental car, to a
fancy restaurant with a great
view of the
San Francisco Bay and the
Golden
Gate.
The food was splendid and the music wonderful. Chet did a
couple of
solo numbers on his guitar
and then a Blues combo took over. There was
dancing! I did my "fake-it
shuffle" with
Jane,
CA and Gillian. Marty danced
with
everyone he could talk into it. Chet fairly beamed with
contentment as
he and his
new sweetie partied.
Of course, there was more
talking at dinner. Talking about sobriety, about
life, about other members (heehee).
For many people, even here, this sort of
relaxed socializing is
unremarkable -- they have it as a matter of course
with friends
and family. But for some of us, it is something we rarely
(or
never)
experience in any other context, at least with the relative
ease that
was apparent
that night.
(3)
On Sunday morning, the 30 or
so delegates met for the official work of the
Congress. Each one was asked
to give a report from the group they represent.
With so many people scheduled
to speak, there was far too little time for
detailed
reports or much real discussion. I had prepared a
scintillating
three page
over-view of the current situation at LSRmail, but I quickly
realized that a
5 or 6 minute report wasn't going to fly. So I made a few
quick remarks
and promised to post my report, which I'll do in the files
section of
LSRmail.
I was very pleased by the
general tone of the delegates' remarks. LSR is
still small and still
struggling to reach a critical mass, but many of the
f2f groups in the Bay area
are at least stable, and some are crowded enough
so that they've
had to split into two groups. New meetings are forming
there, and it
has become difficult to find conveners. There are vibrant
pockets of
growth in
Ontario,
British Columbia and Western
Australia. There
are healthy
groups in
Colorado and upstate New
York, and prospective new
ones "under construction" in
Virginia, Washington State
and elsewhere.
Problems mentioned include
trouble-makers at on-line chats, well-established
groups who aren't getting new
members but are losing those who move on, and
dealing with people who come
to meetings drunk.
I brought up one of my pet
issues, which is providing a "kinder, gentler"
email list for the shy and
fragile. There was some support for the idea, and
no opposition.
Marty, CEO of LSR, passed out
his report on behalf of the board, and it is,
I believe, posted at
unhooked.com. Other reports on people's experiences at
the Congress will be posted
there too, I think.
After the reports, there were
two matters for the group to deal with. First
was a by-law amendment
enabling the Board to issue a country-wide (or
province-wide) charter to
independent LSR entities outside the
United
States.
This was basically a housekeeping change having to do with
the
nature of non-profit group
taxation in some countries. Ben, who helped write
the LSR by-laws, has raised
some concerns since the Congress about
unforeseen
consequences of the change, but given it's utterly
non-controversial intent, I feel sure it can be easily
massaged into shape
next year
without a problem, if that's necessary.
Then there was the election
for three seats on the LSR Board of Directors.
Marty and Jackie both decided
to run for re-election, but Paula opted not
to, so there were three seats
open and two candidates. Following in the
intrepid
footsteps of last year's LSRmail delegate, Richard, I
decided to
run for the
Board. Unlike Richard, I managed to run when there was no
one
else who wanted
the job, so I was swept into office.
That wound up the work of the
Congress and we adjourned. The Board then met
for its only f2f meeting of
the year. Two Board members were absent -- Diane
was too sick to fly and
didn't come to the Congress, and Jackie had to catch
a flight back
to D.C. The main item for discussion, besides assessing how
the Congress
had gone, was to pick the site for the 2005 event.
Sadly, it appears it will be
necessary to break with the tradition which
calls for alternate
Congresses to be held in
Florida. The Florida LSR
groups,
which have undertaken the chore of planning and hosting the
Congress,
don't have the membership they used to have and many of
their
hardest workers
have been very busy with this thing called "life."
The Congress could go back to
Berkeley, but the Board decided to leave it
open for discussion until an
April 25th on-line Board meeting. You're all
invited.
There was a discussion of the
nature of the Congress, whether it should be
primarily educational with
speakers, workshops and outreach to non-LSR
service providers, or more of
a retreat format, which is far more informal
and inwardly
directed. Berkeley Congresses have been the former, while
Florida
Congresses have been the latter. I think it's fair to say
that those
of us using
LSRmail and other internet-based groups would prefer the
retreat
format, where
we get much-needed face-to-face contact with one another.
I'll
be pushing for
that, although the two formats aren't mutually exclusive --
retreats could be planned apart from the Congress.
By 2 p.m. on Sunday all the
official stuff was over. Those who were hanging
around the Bay area for
awhile were invited to Gillian's place for dinner
that night, but I was just
too tired to make it. Sleep has proved elusive at
every LSR
Congress I've attended.
On Monday, Marty had a few of
the stragglers over for dinner, including Jill
from
Australia, Karen (shipmate),
Laura, me, Jane, Marie,
CA, Syl and
Gillian. Eight women and two
men seemed about right to Marty and me,
although Marty's son Jack
helped keep us in line while we devoured a
first-rate
dinner prepared by our host.
I remember very well writing
a report on the 2002 Congress on the way home
from it, just as I wrote this
one. Back then I was six months sober and
totally overwhelmed by
confusing emotions aroused by that event. For two
weeks
afterwards, I was hyper and that was followed by a
depressing let-down
that also
lasted a couple of weeks. Two more years of sobriety, and
two more
years of LSR,
have made me a far different person than I was then. The
differences may
not be obvious to others, but to me they are profound.
Basically, I'm
just stronger in ways that are hard to describe. I came home
this time
feeling as though I'd had a great vacation. I still have
much
ground to
cover; the process is still agonizingly slow, the final
destination is
still unclear, but the realization is quietly settling in
that I'm
getting healthy. It's a hell of a good feeling.
This concludes my report on
the 2004 LSR Congress. Please let me know if you
have any questions. I'm very
grateful to have been a delegate. Thank you. |