| LifeRing convenor Craig
O. asked the members of the Tuesday night Union City CA LifeRing
meeting to complete a pilot version of the membership survey in
September, 2004. This was a test run at the request of the Service
Center, intended to get experience with the questionnaire and to
spot problems with its design.
This group is a face-to-face meeting
that convenes on the premises of the Kaiser Permanente Chemical
Dependency Recovery Program in Union City. This is an
outpatient treatment program that draws clients from a largely
suburban area southeast of San Francisco. There are three
other LifeRing meetings in this facility on different days.
Kaiser Permanente is said to be the largest Health Maintenance
Organization in the U.S. and treats more patients for chemical
dependency than any other program in the country.
Thirty persons of the 31 present at
that LifeRing meeting filled out the questionnaire. This is too
small a sample to support large conclusions. Still, the
results may be of interest. Here is a summary.
As might be expected, more than 80
per cent of this group were currently enrolled in the Kaiser program
or had been enrolled there within the past year. Eighty per
cent had been referred to the LifeRing meeting by a counselor, and
the remainder had been referred by a friend, had seen a LifeRing
brochure, or heard a LifeRing speaker.
Nearly half of this group (14 out of
30) said they had participated in LifeRing for more than a year.
Nine had participated for less than a year but more than three
months. Six had participated for fewer than three months.
Two were experiencing their first or second contact with LifeRing.
All but one of the respondents said
they would recommend LifeRing to their friends. Among the
qualities of the LifeRing meeting that gave them the most
satisfaction, there was a virtual tie between "everyone
participates," "crosstalk is encouraged," "strong support for
abstinence," "absence of religion," "encouragement to build your
personal recovery program," and "positive, empowering atmosphere,"
with more than 60 per cent of the respondents mentioning each of
these qualities.
Among the improvements in LifeRing
that this group of people wanted to see, "more meetings" was the
leader, with 8 of the 16 responses. The remaining 8 responses
were scattered, with such remarks as "It's been great," "I don't see
how it could improve. It's much better than AA or anything else I
have been to," and "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." One respondent
asked for "more structure."
About 80 per cent of this group had
read one or another of the LifeRing brochures (handouts).
About half had visited the unhooked.com web site. About 40 per
cent had used the Recovery by Choice workbook. Other
LifeRing titles were known to fewer than 20 per cent.
Only about 15 per cent of this
sample (n=4) had participated in an online LifeRing meeting (chat
room, email list, or forum). More than 70 per cent said they
"never" used LifeRing online. Sixty per cent of these said the
reason was that "I prefer face to face contact," and the remainder
said they had no Internet access, or did not use computers.
One said he did not know that the online resources existed.
More than half said they attended a LifeRing face meeting about once
a week, and most of the remainder attended more than once a week.
Nearly 80 per cent of this group had
also attended AA or NA at some time in the past. Only four
people had never attended any recovery support group other than
LifeRing. But when asked which support groups they attended
currently, more than half (16 of 30) said they now attended LifeRing
exclusively. The remainder currently attended AA or NA (about
one third) or aftercare support groups provided by the treatment
program, along with LifeRing. Of those who attended both
LifeRing and other support groups, 85 per cent said that their
"main" support group was LifeRing.
Asked what they found in LifeRing
that they didn't get from their other support groups, the sample
responded with comments such as "Better format", "Always get to say
how I'm doing," "The people here are more real," "Much higher
comfort level," "No religion," "Positive input," and "Friendly."
What did they get from their other support groups that LifeRing
didn't have? Two people mentioned "spirituality" and "higher
power." One mentioned more convenient meeting time. Five
said "nothing," and one person wrote "coffee."
Sixty five per cent (18 people) said
they intended to keep attending LifeRing indefinitely -- maybe as
long as they lived. Six people said they weren't sure.
Eighty per cent said they were
attending support group meetings of their own free will. The
remainder said that their treatment program required them to attend.
More than forty per cent of the
sample (n=13) said they were raised Protestant. Nine people
said they were raised in other religions. Eight said they were
not raised in a religion. Asked about their current church
attendance, six people said they attended church regularly every
week, four said they went once or twice a month, three said they
went once or twice a year, and 16 (55 per cent) said they did not
attend at all.
Exactly half the sample (15) said
that they had not been diagnosed with any mental health disorder
during the past year. The other half had received such a
diagnosis, with "clinical depression" by far the leading item.
Eighteen of this sample were male,
12 were female. They ranged in age from 27 to 81, with the
average age being 48. All but five identified their ethnic
group as white. About one fifth (six people) had gone as far
as high school graduation. Nearly half (14 people) had
attended some college or junior college. A third (n=10) had
finished college and/or some postgraduate education. Forty per
cent described their current occupation as "Professional/technical,"
and the remainder were scattered among "managerial-administrative"
(5), "laborer" (3), "service" (3), "clerical" (2) and other.
-- Compiled by Marty
N. (M.A., Sociology, Brandeis University, 1967 (lol!)) |